Based on some of the responses we have received to this post, we would like to clarify what our intent is with the summaries and the framework through which we are evaluating the candidates.
There are many ways to fight racism in fandom and within the OTW. Increased support for volunteers, a more diverse group of volunteers and leadership, a Board and leadership that reflects the growing international makeup of modern fandom, more outreach to and support for non-Anglophone fandoms to broaden our community – we agree that these are all fantastic ways to diversify and better fandom. These are ways that we (fandom as a whole) can all work to make fandom better and more welcoming.
However, the fact is that tackling racism is an enormous project bigger than any one campaign or committee. It is a broad, overarching goal requiring many tactics and actions. We do not purport to be capable of doing all or even a majority of them.
From the beginning, our goals and focus have been intentionally narrow: based on concrete, measurable criteria which have already been promised by the OTW and which we feel are fundamental to making continuing anti-racism work possible. There are many related and overlapping issues and goals but these remain our primary targets as laid out in our first call to action:
There are many promising candidates for this year’s board, and we feel each candidate brings unique skill sets and perspectives that could benefit the OTW. We find much that is promising in all of their platforms for a variety of reasons. Outreach to non-Anglophone fans, increased demographic and national diversity on the board, tackling AI, support for OTW volunteers, these are all important and relevant issues but outside the intentionally narrow scope of this action and movement.
Our summaries are not intended to be one-stop-shop analyses of the entirety of a candidate’s platform with regards to racism. Just as we have not endorsed any candidates (and we may not), we do not intend to disparage any candidates.
We are conscious that our campaign and the goals we are pushing for may not have made it onto the radars of the candidates in time for them to speak on it, and that there may be language barriers and differing ideas on the vocabulary around racism, anti-racism etc. between us and the candidates. That is why we would love a larger discussion with the candidates on their views with regards to our specific goals and would publish their answers in full, because we are sure they have insights and perspectives that we look forward to taking into consideration.
There are many ways to fight racism in fandom and within the OTW. Increased support for volunteers, a more diverse group of volunteers and leadership, a Board and leadership that reflects the growing international makeup of modern fandom, more outreach to and support for non-Anglophone fandoms to broaden our community – we agree that these are all fantastic ways to diversify and better fandom. These are ways that we (fandom as a whole) can all work to make fandom better and more welcoming.
However, the fact is that tackling racism is an enormous project bigger than any one campaign or committee. It is a broad, overarching goal requiring many tactics and actions. We do not purport to be capable of doing all or even a majority of them.
From the beginning, our goals and focus have been intentionally narrow: based on concrete, measurable criteria which have already been promised by the OTW and which we feel are fundamental to making continuing anti-racism work possible. There are many related and overlapping issues and goals but these remain our primary targets as laid out in our first call to action:
- An updated TOS equipped to deal with targeted harassment and policies regarding abusive content.
- Hiring a diversity consultant.
- Committing to a policy of transparency with increased communication from the OTW to their user base.
There are many promising candidates for this year’s board, and we feel each candidate brings unique skill sets and perspectives that could benefit the OTW. We find much that is promising in all of their platforms for a variety of reasons. Outreach to non-Anglophone fans, increased demographic and national diversity on the board, tackling AI, support for OTW volunteers, these are all important and relevant issues but outside the intentionally narrow scope of this action and movement.
Our summaries are not intended to be one-stop-shop analyses of the entirety of a candidate’s platform with regards to racism. Just as we have not endorsed any candidates (and we may not), we do not intend to disparage any candidates.
We are conscious that our campaign and the goals we are pushing for may not have made it onto the radars of the candidates in time for them to speak on it, and that there may be language barriers and differing ideas on the vocabulary around racism, anti-racism etc. between us and the candidates. That is why we would love a larger discussion with the candidates on their views with regards to our specific goals and would publish their answers in full, because we are sure they have insights and perspectives that we look forward to taking into consideration.